首页> 外文OA文献 >Insulin sensitivity in women: a comparison among values derived from intravenous glucose tolerance tests with different sampling frequency, oral glucose tolerance test or fasting
【2h】

Insulin sensitivity in women: a comparison among values derived from intravenous glucose tolerance tests with different sampling frequency, oral glucose tolerance test or fasting

机译:女性的胰岛素敏感性:不同采样频率,口服葡萄糖耐量试验或禁食的静脉葡萄糖耐量试验得出的值之间的比较

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

OBJECTIVE:To determine the correlation between insulin sensitivity (S(I)) obtained by the minimal model method applied to a frequently sampled (n=33) intravenous glucose tolerance test (FSIGT(33)), and values obtained by reduced FSIGTs, oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT), or fasting.DESIGN:Retrospective analysis on tests performed in prospective studies.METHODS:A total of 78 FSIGT(33), and 59 OGTT were performed in non-diabetic women of which 10 were young cyclic females in the early follicular menstrual phase, 10 were young non-obese subjects with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) and 30 were in post-menopause. Some of these individuals were investigated both prior to and during specified treatments. FSIGT(33) was transformed into FSIGT(22) and FSIGT(12) by removing samples from the analysis. Values of SI derived from reduced FSIGTs or calculations performed on glucose and insulin values observed in fasting conditions and/or during OGTT were related to those of FSIGT(33).RESULTS:S(I) values derived from FSIGT(33) were highly correlated with those derived from FSIGT(22) (r=0.965) or FSIGT(12) (r=0.955), but were only weakly correlated with those derived from fasting or OGTT calculations (r below 0.5). Between-group (PCOS vs normal) or within-group (prior to and during treatment) comparisons showed that reduced FSIGTs were only slightly less powerful than FSIGT(33) in detecting differences in S(I).CONCLUSIONS:In non-diabetic women, reduced FSIGTs but not calculations based on fasting or OGTT values may be used in place of FSIGT(33) to document S(I) and its variation.
机译:目的:确定通过最小模型方法获得的胰岛素敏感性(S(I))与通过频繁采样(n = 33)静脉葡萄糖耐量测试(FSIGT(33))所获得的值之间的相关性葡萄糖耐量试验(OGTT)或禁食。设计:对前瞻性研究进行的回顾性分析方法:非糖尿病女性共进行78例FSIGT(33)和59例OGTT,其中10例为年轻的周期性女性在卵泡期早期,有10名年轻的非肥胖多囊卵巢综合征(PCOS)受试者和30名绝经后的受试者。在特定治疗之前和期间,对其中一些个体进行了调查。通过从分析中删除样本,将FSIGT(33)转换为FSIGT(22)和FSIGT(12)。从减少的FSIGT得出的SI值或对在禁食条件下和/或在OGTT期间观察到的葡萄糖和胰岛素值进行计算得出的SI值与FSIGT(33)相关。结果:从FSIGT(33)得出的S(I)值高度相关与那些来自FSIGT(22)(r = 0.965)或FSIGT(12)(r = 0.955)的变量,但与来自禁食或OGTT计算得出的变量之间的相关性很弱(r低于0.5)。组间(PCOS vs正常)或组内(治疗前和治疗期间)的比较显示,降低的FSIGT在检测S(I)差异方面仅比FSIGT(33)稍弱。结论:非糖尿病女性,可以使用减少的FSIGT,但不使用基于禁食或OGTT值的计算来代替FSIGT(33)来记录S(I)及其变化。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号